Geographic Information Systems; GIS for East Gippsland's forest
a photo-gallery of artworks Photo Gallery Geographic Information System of East Gippsland's forest links to recommended websites Research and editorials on forests Scientific Reports

The above pictures are buttons, which if clicked on will open various sections of this website.

GIS

GIS Project

Introduction

Goolengook
case study

Errinundra scouting map

Dingo Creek, a GIS case study
By Tony Hastings 5/11/04


To determine the accuracy of the datasets, the results of surveys conducted at Dingo Creek were used. A map showing the survey area is shown below
Dingo Creek map
During the surveys a hand-held GLobal Positioning System, GPS, was used to record locations. This was later connected tothe computer by a cable,a dn all the points loaded into the GIS mapping system. the small + signs on the map represent a GPS point recorded in the forest.
The green hatched area representing rainforest was determind by walking around the boundary of the rainforest, plotting GPS points and from aerial photo interpretation. The yellow line represents a transect survey, done to record the proportion of rainforest species along the survey line, which went through some Mixed Forest.

transect survey graph
Each line represents the canopy width of each species, and the circle is a scale representation of the tree trunk diameter.
A photo of the Mixed Forest is shown right

Mixed Forest
SFRI comparison

The map left shows a comparison of the "SFRI" data supplied by the DSE with data collected in the forest. The shape of the clearfell, which they shows as black and I've drawn iwth a white dashed line, shows that their map understates the size of the coupe and is upto 200m from the actual boundary.
The SFRI map includes the Mixed Forest stand as "Mature", although it actually represents a Senescent phase in eucalypt ecology. Other stands of giant old-growth trees are simlarly labelled "Mature", when they are in fact Late Mature. This is an important difference because many conservation groups call for the protection of old-growth forests, and if using the GIS would only map the "Late Mature" and "Senescent" stands as old-growth.

Stagg Creek

In the above image, GIS data is shown for the red outline stand. A forest Manager responsbile for planning coupes would read from the GIS that it is a mature eucalypt forest, dominated by Cut-tail Ash, Eucalyptus fastigata, with some Shining Gums, Eucalyptus denticulata, which are listed as Major Commerical species. The pink area is a "Special Protection Zone", where logging is not allowed. As far as this information tells us, the stand is in an area zoned available for logging and has appropriate species in it. Why shouldn't they log that?

Stagg Creek detail
Enlarging the image to see more detial of the stand, it is apparent that a large proportion of the stand is in fact rainforest. Using mapping software to measure a crownsize, it is 42m wide - much more than the 10 - 14.9m specified. After visiting the site, I know they are all in fact Shining Gums, with a continuous rainforest understorey. The site is inside a Rainforest Site of National Significance, which requries "special planning to protect the rainforest values". This means that the majority of species are not suitable for logging, and Code of Practice requriements do not allow logging in this stand!
This example highlights the problem of relying on GIS data. The odd part is that the aerial photo shown is the same one as was used to create the SFRI database.


Return to home page